Heather Dawn: Godfrey. P.G.C.E., B.Sc. (Joint Hon)
COVID-19 ‘swept the world’ into a frenzy of alarm last year. So much so that governments around the globe unilaterally sanctioned, ‘post-haste’, emergency lockdown (an unfortunate prison term) (Gieske 2020), social behavioural dictates (which include self isolation, distancing, mask wearing, and who how and when person to person interaction is acceptable and appropriate), and the rapid rollout of inoculation/vaccine (or rather, injection or ‘jab’) programmes, while apparently proactively denouncing and clearly ignoring other less aggressive, but potentially effective, immune supporting solutions (Kaufman et al 2020).
The promotional language (selling the notion of COVID-19) is persuasive and emotive, instilling fear and implying that, at the very least, everyone has a moral obligation, a duty, to ‘get the jab’ to protect the ‘vulnerable’. The usual scientific debate, discussion and deliberation are caste to the wayside, the narrative singular and narrow. (United Health Professionals 2021, Yeadon 2021, Mikovitis 2020)
Thus, a unilateral state of emergency was declared 25th March 2020 (the UK’s Coronavirus Act 2020 was fast tracked through parliament in just four sitting days in spite of the fact the World Health Organisation downgraded COVID-19 from being a high consequence infectious disease of concern on 19th March 2020), giving unregulated license for governments around the world to sanction draconian measures of control (of movement and behaviour) and permission to roll out untested (the normal time period to test for efficacy and safety of a new drug is 10 to 15 years) universal treatments, which include never-used-before RNA and DNA modulating injections.
Yet, in spite of the urgency and furore, over ninety-nine per cent of people infected with COVID-19 survive (of those infected, some experience mild to moderate flu-like symptoms, while many experience no symptoms at all, that is, they are asymptomatic – asymptomatic people do not spread disease. The 1% or so who become seriously ill and who may die as a result, are mostly elderly (over 65 years old – the survival rate of 70+ year olds who contract COVID-19 is apparently around 94.6%) and / or have co-morbidities and underlying chronic health conditions; a comparatively small number of younger people with compromised immune systems, chronic or serious co-morbidities are also included within this 1%. But is this a reasonable basis on which to close down society? Practical support, care and resources provided directly to the elderly and vulnerable, surely, would provide a better, more efficient, compassionate and cost effective route; a honed and efficient route that would not in its wake destroy the interactive fabric of wider society. (Lord Sumption 2021)
The PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) test, unilaterally applied to determine the presence of COVID-19 infection (HIV and other viral infections), was not designed for this purpose; it is not an accurate or specific measure (ambiguously detecting particles of proteins, exosomes and other cell exudes without true distinction) and is inclined to produce a high proportion of false-positives when testing parameters are set too high. (Farber 2020) Of concern, the virus has apparently not actually been isolated in whole form. Parts of what appear to be viral particles (not the whole or complete virus) have been isolated and applied to produce a computer generated model (in silico) of the viruses anticipated structure, and this model is applied to determine the presence of infection. Also, the virus has mutated several hundred times since it’s apparent original detection in 2019 (as viruses generally do); it is not clear which version of the virus is applied to test for infection. Even so, the PCR test, applying the in silico modelled version of virus, is the instrument of choice to determine ‘levels of infection’, ‘new cases’ and whether a person died ‘with’ or ‘of’ COVID-19. Anyone who dies, no matter the cause of death, who registers a positive PCR-test result 28 days prior to their death is included in the ‘death with COVID-19’ statistics). (Dr Reiner Fuellmich and Ray Fleurs of Children’s Health Defence have recently filed lawsuits in America and Europe contesting the validity of applying PCR tests to determine the presence and prevalence of COVID-19)
In spite of the ‘war-time’ rhetoric and relentless media coverage providing daily news of the ‘vaccine’ (injection) rollout (daily ‘COVID death’ tallies, ‘vaccine’ uptake numbers, and rallying calls for obedience “hands, face, distance, get the jab”), the UK government, so far, have not mandated overt compulsory uptake of the ‘vaccine’ (although vaccine compliance is strongly implied in the ‘herd immunity’ language, and coercion is insidiously levered via the ‘vaccine’ passport required to re-enter elements of work, social life and to travel post lockdowns).
Is this because the ‘vaccines’, which are not vaccines in the usual sense, but genetic / mRNA / DNA modulating injections, are still in their trial phase; tests are incomplete, efficacy and safety are inconclusive – the ‘vaccine rollout’ is, in reality, a massive unilateral trial ? (Wakefield 2021) Even the manufacturers assert/confirm that the ‘vaccine’ rollout is a work-in-progress; trials remain ongoing and are not scheduled to conclude until at least 2023 – as previously established, the usual vaccine and drug trial timeframe is ten to fifteen years. In deed, the Drug Safety Research Unit, which is funded by the Office of the Chief Scientific Advisor (Sir Patrick Valance) and the Pharmaceutical Industry, is currently seeking volunteers to ‘register your interest in our study – Monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in the UK’ (although the DSRU claims to be an ‘independent unit’, the conflict of interest is apparent). (DSRU 2021) In truth, every person ‘jabbed’ is a test subject, a participant in an ongoing experiment. Dr. Sam Bailey, clarifying the protocols and process of clinical trials, clearly and succinctly explains how these trials normally work here.
Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Oxford AstraZeneca are the main COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ (injection) providers; however, there are other contenders, for example, Johnson & Johnson, Sinovac, Noravax, CureVav, and Russia’s Sputnik V. (Kollewe 2021) Pfizer and Moderna acknowledge in their patient information leaflets:
It is your choice to receive or not receive the Pfizer-BioNTech (Moderna) COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ (injection). Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard medical care. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has not undergone the same type of review as an FDA-approved or cleared product. COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19. [none of the ‘vaccines’ (injections) produced so far prevent infection or cure COVID-19 but may modify symptoms]
Oxford-AstraZeneca (OAZ) does not directly clarify this in their patient information leaflet, but do affirm that trials are ongoing (please note that clinical trials are usually double-blind and include an inert placebo with which to offset results):
The clinical efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca has been evaluated based on an analysis of pooled data from two on-going randomised, blinded, controlled trials: a phase II/III study, COV002, in adults ≥18 years of age (including the elderly) in the UK; and a phase III study, COV003, in adults ≥18 years of age (including the elderly) in Brazil.
All participants are planned to be followed for up to 12 months, for assessments of safety and efficacy against COVID-19 disease.
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) confirm, on behalf of OAZ (this information does not appear in their own patient leaflet), that it is up to you to decide whether or not to get the vaccine (injection) , and add:
If you decide to get the vaccine, you will give your consent, which will be recorded.
The UK Medical Freedom Alliance (8th January 2021) acknowledge:
The trials for the Oxford-AstraZeneca trials [vaccines] have come under some criticism e.g. for the mixed dosing regimens used and for combining multiple different studies. Recent announcements regarding the potential to combine the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine with the Russian Sputnik V have not explained how safety standards will be assured (1).
There is conflicting guidance in place on the inter-changeability of vaccines (use of alternative if the same vaccine isn’t available for the 2nd dose) – both Public Health England (2) and the CDC (3) advise against this.
The ‘vaccine’ (injection) manufacturers are absolved of any liability should their ‘vaccines’ prove injurious or fatal (Sigalos 2021; UK Dept. of the Health and Social Care 2020). To reiterate, the ‘vaccines’ are still in their trial phase and are not officially approved; voluntary consent must be acquired from experiment participants prior to procedure; we give our consent, therefore permission, by voluntarily agreeing to participate in any medical intervention (drugs, vaccines, or procedure); this agreement is further sealed when you signature your consent. Thus, we collude.
‘Vaccine’ (injection) Ingredients
The following lists, taken from respective Patient Information Leaflets, are not exhaustive (side effects number in the hundreds, from mild to lethal). None of the vaccines (injections) include live SARS-CoV-2 virus, which to-date has not been appropriately isolated and identified (a computer model has been generated based on an incomplete particle assumed to be of the virus).
To view the Yellow Card Adverse Reaction Report, which provides a comprehensive list of adverse events for each inoculation brand (see summary of current total adverse events below):
mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid)
lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3- phosphocholine, and cholesterol)
monobasic potassium phosphate
dibasic sodium phosphate dehydrate
mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid)
lipids (SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC])
ChAdOx1-S* recombinant (recombinant = chimpanzee adenovirus vector encoding the SARS CoV 2 Spike glycoprotein, modified to avoid its replication). ChAdOx1-S* recombinant is produced in genetically modified human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. Adenovirus’s typically cause colds or ‘flu-like symptoms.
L-histidine hydrochloride monohydrate
magnesium chloride hexahydrate
disodium edetate dihydrate
water for injections
Side Effects of the Vaccines (injections) (these lists are not exhaustive). Please note that long-term side effects are still unknown
Injection site pain
Injection site swelling
Injection site redness
Swollen lymph nodes (lymphadenopathy)
Non-severe allergic reactions such as rash, itching, hives, or swelling of the face
Severe allergic reactions
Injection site pain, tenderness and swelling of the lymph nodes in the same arm of the injection, swelling (hardness), and redness
Nausea and vomiting
Tenderness, pain, warmth, itching or bruising where the injection is given
Generally feeling unwell
Feeling tired (fatigue)
Chills or feeling feverish
Feeling sick (nausea)
Joint pain or muscle ache
Swelling, redness or a lump at the injection site
Being sick (vomiting) or diarrhoea
Flu-like symptoms, such as high temperature, sore throat, runny nose, cough and chills
Enlarged lymph nodes
Excessive sweating, itchy skin or rash
In brief, a spike protein code or recipe is imprinted on the front of mRNA strands, that are coated with three layers of lipid and cholesterol to ensure safe transference to cells within the body. The mRNA co-ops the cells ribosomes, where the code is translated to generate SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Registering these proteins as foreign particles, the body’s immune system creates anti-bodies to stave proliferation of the ‘invader’. This is a novel bio-chemical process never used in humans before.
The long-term influence of these vaccines (injections) is unknown. However, it is known that they initiate permanent cellular changes/alteration in the body (they do not ‘pass through’ and cannot be detoxed or cleansed from the body, once inside, that’s it, they are there for life). (Wakefield 2021, Grau 2021)
The effect these ‘vaccines’ (injections) have on COVID-19, according to the developers, is to reduce the severity of symptoms: they do not prevent infection, or the spread of infection. As previously established, most people who experience severe COVID-19 symptoms are elderly (65 years and older), are very over-weight, and / or have underlying chronic health conditions and compromised immune systems.
Bio-medicine has an important part to play in an integrated healthcare system. There are many instances where the use of certain drugs and procedures, including vaccines (in their usual capacity), may be valuable, especially in emergency and lifesaving scenarios. Unilateral global inoculation of an untested substance (with yet unknown short or long term risks and/or outcomes) into otherwise healthy people, which may (or may not) temporarily modify (not even stave) the effect of a ‘novel’ virus, however, is, in the circumstances, very concerning. Also of concern is the influence the ‘vaccine’ (injection) may have on the natural process of virus mutation. The risks of these measures have already outweighed the benefits when the damage incurred by ‘lockdown’ alone is considered; the impending economic catastrophe, businesses destroyed, jobs loss and redundancies, lives ruined, the unfolding health and social care crisis, increased numbers of suicides, deteriorating mental health, increased suffering and premature death due to untreated medical conditions, and more. COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ Yellow Card Reports of injuries and side effects are also extremely concerning; especially when considering these injuries and side effects under reported.
The immediate effectiveness of the ‘jab’ is short lived; it is likely that bi-annual or annual ‘top up’ inoculations, or ‘booster jabs’, will be required indefinitely. The influence the ‘jab’ has on cellular function, organ function, the immune system, and the internal microbiome may take years to manifest and discover. Pharmaceutical companies, who have already made vast profits from the ‘vaccine rollout’, are, ironically, ‘immune’ from liability should the vaccine prove ineffective or harmful. It is very likely that herd immunity was naturally achieved by March 2020, about the same time the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the UK Government downgraded the virus from a high consequence infectious disease (19th March), and just days before they instigated a state of national emergency (25th March).
To ‘V’ or not to ‘V’: the CHOICE IS YOURS. ‘Vaccine’ manufactures affirm the experimental status of the ‘vaccine’ (injection) rollout. They also acknowledge that their ‘vaccines’ (injections) will not prevent infection nor the spread of infection but may modify symptoms (symptoms which do not manifest or are not problematic for over 95% of people infected).
What ever you decide to do, consider your options very carefully; the long-term and consequential knock-on effects of the ‘vaccines’ (injections) are irreversible and unknown and will take years, perhaps generations (that is, if fertility is not diminished too – another side effect of concern) to manifest.
It is natural, ethical and sensible to protect those who are vulnerable. Selective, carefully considered and protective support and isolation can be applied without depriving those who are vulnerable from meaningful healthy contact, interaction and social stimulation. There are alternatives other than the above measures taken to achieve this, beginning, for example, by exploring positive ways to build and support the immune system and natural resilience – healthy balanced diet, exercise, fresh air, rest and relaxation, positive purpose and ventures, joy, laughter, happiness, community, sense of safety and security (those fundamental ingredients stifled by being ‘lockdown’ and fed fearful political media narratives).
Yellow Card Reports of Adverse Reactions: The SARS-CoV-2 MRNA (COVID-19) vaccine (13th November 2021) (figures x 10 to account for under reporting) – in normal circumstances, trials are terminated immediately if there are 20 to 30 deaths.
Summary (as at 13th November 2021)
Astra-Zeneca Reactions: 838,844 (8,388,440) Deaths: 1,118 (11,180)
Pfizer Reactions: 363,704 (3,637,040) Deaths: 597 (5,970)
Moderna Reactions: 55,564 (555,640) Deaths: 19 (190)
Brand Unspecified: Reactions: 3,602 (36,020) Deaths: 32 (320)
Masked People image: Image by <a href=”https://pixabay.com/users/andremsantana-61090/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=5306374″>André Santana AndreMS</a> from <a href=”https://pixabay.com/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=5306374″>Pixabay</a>
Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr, Hilde De Smit, Dr. Nils R. Fosse, Dr. Elizabeth Evans, Dr. Mohammed Adil, Dr. Vernon Coleman, Prof. Delores Cahill, Dr. R Zac Cox, Dr. Anna Forbes, Dr. Ralf ER Sundberg, Dr. Johan Denis, Dr. Danial Cullum, Moritz von der Borch, Dr. Anne Fierlfijn, Dr. Tom Cowen, Dr. Kevin Corbett, Dr. Carrie Madej, Dr. Barre Lando, Kate Shemirani, Sandy Lunoe, Boris Dragin, Dr. Piotr Rubas, Dr. Natelie Prego Cancelo, Dr. Rashid Buttar, Dr. Nour De San, Dr. Kelly Brogan, Prof. Konstantin Pavlidis, Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, Senta Depuydt, Dr. Heiko Santelmann, Dr. Margareta Griesz-Brisson, Dr. Mikael Nordfors, Dr. Elf F. de Klerk (December 2020) Ask the Experts (COVID-19 Vaccine). Brand New Tube https://brandnewtube.com/watch/ask-the-experts-covid-19-vaccine-now-banned-on-youtube-and-facebook_qIsNohSIeSgfz2J.html
Prof. Johan Gieske (3rd May 2020) Why lockdowns are the wrong policy. UnHerd, Brand New Tube https://brandnewtube.com/watch/why-lockdowns-are-the-wrong-policy-swedish-expert-prof-johan-giesecke_9Dzb6SPs8941qvt.html
United Health Professionals (25th February 2021) The COVID Outbreak: ‘Biggest Health Scam of the 21st Century.” Report by 1500 Health Professionals. https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-covid-outbreak-biggest-health-scam-of-the-21st-century-report-by-1500-health-professionals/5737838
Dr. Michael Yeadon (2021) Interview with James Delingole: Dr Mike Yeadon, former CSO and VP, Allergy and Respiratory Research Head with Pfizer Global R & D and co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Limited, talks about his grave concerns about the Coronoavirus jab . https://www.bitchute.com/video/7RpkefVK8OBM/
Dr. Judy Mikovitis Ph.D. (3rd May 2020) Dr. Judy Mikovitis talks about COVID-19. The Academy of Nutritional Medicine. Brand New Tube. https://brandnewtube.com/watch/dr-judy-mikovits-talks-about-covid-19_MAfJ8QJHmkvsa8S.html
Lord Jonathan Sumption, Freddie Sayer (4th March 2021) Lord Summtion: Civil Disobedience Has Begun. Unherd https://unherd.com/2021/03/lord-sumption-civil-disobedience-has-begun/?fbclid=IwAR3wmVkw-nUrNZLpHmxSn_dhICBo6lH8yCAqn4ToukZsJVSexet-d0Cduzc
Celia Farber (2020) Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus? Green Med Info (Originally published on www.uncoverdc.com). https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/was-covid-19-test-meant-detect-virus
Dr Andrew Wakefield (12th January 2021) Dr. Andrew Wakefield Explains… Mysteries, Truths and Conspiracies. https://www.facebook.com/421810971537891/videos/868048803929798
MacKenzie Sigalos (2021) You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe COVID vaccine side effects. The government likely won’t compensate you for damages either. CNBC, Health and Science https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html
Department of Health and Social Care (16th October 2020) Consultation document: changes to human medicine Regulations to support the roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines: 2. Civil liability and immunity. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/distributing-vaccines-and-treatments-for-covid-19-and-flu/consultation-document-changes-to-human-medicine-regulations-to-support-the-rollout-of-covid-19-vaccines
Dr. Sam Bailey (2nd February 2021) How do clinical trials usually work? You tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7h7mLhjYvF8
Drug Safety Research Unit (26th February 2021) Monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in the UK – study information. https://www.dsru.org/service/monitoring-the-safety-of-covid-19-vaccines-in-the-uk-study-information/ Funded by the Office of the Chief Scientific Advisor (Sir Patrick Valance) and the Pharmaceutical Industry.
UK Medical Freedom Alliance (8th January 2021) AstraZenenic / Oxford Coid-19 Vaccine: Patient information Leaflet. https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5fa5866942937a4d73918723/5ffc576b3209bc2242d4ee7e_UKMFA_AstraZenica_COVID-19_Vaccine.pdf
Jean-Michel Grau (17th February 2021) The greatest Nuremberg of all time is on its way. The Second Coming Institute. http://sciprint.blogspot.com/2021/02/the-greatest-nuremberg-of-all-time-is.html
Pfizer. FDA Fact sheet for recipients and caregivers. Emergency use authorization of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 in individuals 16 years of age and older. https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
Moderna. FDA Fact sheet for recipients and caregivers. Emergency use authorization of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 in individuals 18 years of age and older. https://www.fda.gov/media/144638/download
Oxford-AstraZeneca. Information for UK recipients on COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZenica. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca/information-for-uk-recipients-on-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca#contents-of-the-pack-and-other-information
Corona Virus: Weekly summary report of adverse. reactions. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting